<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile Search, Blended Indexes, Content Ranking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2008/02/13/mobile-search-blended-indexes-content-ranking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2008/02/13/mobile-search-blended-indexes-content-ranking/</link>
	<description>Ripping mobility from the clutches of telecom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:46:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: miker</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2008/02/13/mobile-search-blended-indexes-content-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-239261</link>
		<dc:creator>miker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2008/02/13/mobile-search-blended-indexes-content-ranking/#comment-239261</guid>
		<description>Hey Dennis,
    Thanks for the comment.  I agree, definitely, when it comes to organizing and presenting your information design for users and not the indexes.  However, when you&#039;re building a content adapting proxy it requires certain behaviors in order to make sure you&#039;re behaving properly as a citizen of the ecosystem on the whole.  That&#039;s the part I&#039;m somewhat unsure about.
- Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dennis,<br />
    Thanks for the comment.  I agree, definitely, when it comes to organizing and presenting your information design for users and not the indexes.  However, when you&#8217;re building a content adapting proxy it requires certain behaviors in order to make sure you&#8217;re behaving properly as a citizen of the ecosystem on the whole.  That&#8217;s the part I&#8217;m somewhat unsure about.<br />
- Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2008/02/13/mobile-search-blended-indexes-content-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-239082</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2008/02/13/mobile-search-blended-indexes-content-ranking/#comment-239082</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve agonized over the same issues. I ended up just  having both web and mobile Google sitemaps and putting every page in the appropriate sitemap without worrying about duplicate content. I also use the handheld meta tag to point to mobile content from web content and to recursively point from mobile content to itself.

I&#039;m pretty satisfied with the results, 80% of my mobile and my web traffic comes from Google and traffic has been growing steadily.  Most of my pages are indexed too. 

I think Google&#039;s algorithms should recognize that duplicate content across a full-web site and it&#039;s mobile counterpart is a good thing and not penalize it.  

It sure would be nice if Google did a better job of documenting what they consider best practices for webmasters. I still think the best approach (and something I think Matt Cutts and other Googlers have said) is to ignore Google and design for users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve agonized over the same issues. I ended up just  having both web and mobile Google sitemaps and putting every page in the appropriate sitemap without worrying about duplicate content. I also use the handheld meta tag to point to mobile content from web content and to recursively point from mobile content to itself.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty satisfied with the results, 80% of my mobile and my web traffic comes from Google and traffic has been growing steadily.  Most of my pages are indexed too. </p>
<p>I think Google&#8217;s algorithms should recognize that duplicate content across a full-web site and it&#8217;s mobile counterpart is a good thing and not penalize it.  </p>
<p>It sure would be nice if Google did a better job of documenting what they consider best practices for webmasters. I still think the best approach (and something I think Matt Cutts and other Googlers have said) is to ignore Google and design for users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miker</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2008/02/13/mobile-search-blended-indexes-content-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-238878</link>
		<dc:creator>miker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2008/02/13/mobile-search-blended-indexes-content-ranking/#comment-238878</guid>
		<description>We have!! The Googlebot is denied /web, but still the content is showing up in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have!! The Googlebot is denied /web, but still the content is showing up in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aufmobi</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2008/02/13/mobile-search-blended-indexes-content-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-238866</link>
		<dc:creator>aufmobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2008/02/13/mobile-search-blended-indexes-content-ranking/#comment-238866</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really surprised to see all the mowser transcoded sites indexed in google.

You should really block your transcoded pages via robots.txt or put a noindex meta tag on it. 

That&#039;s a major duplicate content seo ding to anyone&#039;s site that get&#039;s caught in the google mowser index. I would be pretty pissed myself if my site was in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really surprised to see all the mowser transcoded sites indexed in google.</p>
<p>You should really block your transcoded pages via robots.txt or put a noindex meta tag on it. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a major duplicate content seo ding to anyone&#8217;s site that get&#8217;s caught in the google mowser index. I would be pretty pissed myself if my site was in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

