<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plane Friendly Mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2007/05/18/plane-friendly-mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2007/05/18/plane-friendly-mobile/</link>
	<description>Ripping mobility from the clutches of telecom</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: miker</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2007/05/18/plane-friendly-mobile/#comment-127368</link>
		<dc:creator>miker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 19:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=326#comment-127368</guid>
		<description>I've heard stories one way and the other.  But I've definitely also been on planes where wifi was available:

http://www.rowehl.com/blog/?p=500

Sure, those particular planes might have had something else done to them in order to make them wifi proof.  For all the times I've seen MacBooks around with the Bluetooth on and WiFi on, and Windows machines that are just perpetually on (ever try scanning for wifi hotspots on a plane to check out the interesting Windows behavior? http://tinyurl.com/2rj6cw)  I have to assume that even if there is a regulation, no one is respecting it and the grounds for it are misplaced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard stories one way and the other.  But I&#8217;ve definitely also been on planes where wifi was available:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rowehl.com/blog/?p=500" rel="nofollow">http://www.rowehl.com/blog/?p=500</a></p>
<p>Sure, those particular planes might have had something else done to them in order to make them wifi proof.  For all the times I&#8217;ve seen MacBooks around with the Bluetooth on and WiFi on, and Windows machines that are just perpetually on (ever try scanning for wifi hotspots on a plane to check out the interesting Windows behavior? <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2rj6cw" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2rj6cw</a>)  I have to assume that even if there is a regulation, no one is respecting it and the grounds for it are misplaced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernardo</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2007/05/18/plane-friendly-mobile/#comment-126709</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 04:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=326#comment-126709</guid>
		<description>Hm... but can you use a bluetooth device on a plane? I don't think so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm&#8230; but can you use a bluetooth device on a plane? I don&#8217;t think so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Plane Friendly Mobile - Online computer networking security</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2007/05/18/plane-friendly-mobile/#comment-124756</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Plane Friendly Mobile - Online computer networking security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 07:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=326#comment-124756</guid>
		<description>[...] more at miker     [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more at miker     [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
