<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile 2.0 &#8211; Didn&#8217;t Quite Do It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/11/07/mobile-20-didnt-quite-do-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/11/07/mobile-20-didnt-quite-do-it/</link>
	<description>Ripping mobility from the clutches of telecom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:46:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: G-ROC web applications &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mobile 2.0 Event review</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/11/07/mobile-20-didnt-quite-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-174510</link>
		<dc:creator>G-ROC web applications &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mobile 2.0 Event review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=225#comment-174510</guid>
		<description>[...] Also check out the comments of Mike Rowehl, one of the organizers of the event, who was not quite happy with his own event. I think I have to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also check out the comments of Mike Rowehl, one of the organizers of the event, who was not quite happy with his own event. I think I have to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rowehl: This is Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Registration is Open for Mobile 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/11/07/mobile-20-didnt-quite-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-171452</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rowehl: This is Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Registration is Open for Mobile 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=225#comment-171452</guid>
		<description>[...] the event last year was a great gathering of the best and brightest in mobile, however there were some things that didn&#8217;t turn out fantastic in my opinion. We&#8217;ve tried to do what we can to correct. For instance there are no slides for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the event last year was a great gathering of the best and brightest in mobile, however there were some things that didn&#8217;t turn out fantastic in my opinion. We&#8217;ve tried to do what we can to correct. For instance there are no slides for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twofones</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/11/07/mobile-20-didnt-quite-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-39002</link>
		<dc:creator>twofones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=225#comment-39002</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wireless Influencers...&lt;/strong&gt;

Rutberg ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wireless Influencers&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Rutberg &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PavingWays - web applications on (mobile) devices</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/11/07/mobile-20-didnt-quite-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-38974</link>
		<dc:creator>PavingWays - web applications on (mobile) devices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 22:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=225#comment-38974</guid>
		<description>[...] PPS: Also check out the comments of Mike Rowehl, one of the organizers of the event, who was not quite happy with his own event. I think I have to disagree with him that Mobile 2.0 &#8220;didn&#8217;t quite do it&#8221;, because at least for me it was quite a good experience. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PPS: Also check out the comments of Mike Rowehl, one of the organizers of the event, who was not quite happy with his own event. I think I have to disagree with him that Mobile 2.0 &#8220;didn&#8217;t quite do it&#8221;, because at least for me it was quite a good experience. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocco Georgi</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/11/07/mobile-20-didnt-quite-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-38972</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocco Georgi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 22:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=225#comment-38972</guid>
		<description>I also attended the event on Monday and in my opinion it was not as bad as you might feel. There were a lot of interesting people to talk to - and that&#039;s the main thing I was looking for. The presentations were 50% interesting - have to agree that there were too many powerpoints and too many presentations about plain uninteresting things (especially the one from Verisign). Still there were a lot of interesting things to be heard.
I&#039;m a web developer trying to get my own services on mobile browsers up and running and the event cleared many things up and also strengthened some of my assumptions that i had about many things in this field. My summary about the event can be found on my blog here: http://www.pavingways.com/mobile2event-review_59.html
I hope there will be more events like this, maybe a little more tilted towards smaller companies (like mine), towards developers (because we are the ones that will build the applcations that make people use the mobile web), maybe at a cheaper location (the entrance fee was more than ok to me, double the fee hadn&#039;t hurt), also more tilted towards networking between professionals in the field.

Rocco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also attended the event on Monday and in my opinion it was not as bad as you might feel. There were a lot of interesting people to talk to &#8211; and that&#8217;s the main thing I was looking for. The presentations were 50% interesting &#8211; have to agree that there were too many powerpoints and too many presentations about plain uninteresting things (especially the one from Verisign). Still there were a lot of interesting things to be heard.<br />
I&#8217;m a web developer trying to get my own services on mobile browsers up and running and the event cleared many things up and also strengthened some of my assumptions that i had about many things in this field. My summary about the event can be found on my blog here: <a href="http://www.pavingways.com/mobile2event-review_59.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pavingways.com/mobile2event-review_59.html</a><br />
I hope there will be more events like this, maybe a little more tilted towards smaller companies (like mine), towards developers (because we are the ones that will build the applcations that make people use the mobile web), maybe at a cheaper location (the entrance fee was more than ok to me, double the fee hadn&#8217;t hurt), also more tilted towards networking between professionals in the field.</p>
<p>Rocco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rowehl: This is Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some Great Posts from Mobile 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/11/07/mobile-20-didnt-quite-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-38953</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rowehl: This is Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some Great Posts from Mobile 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=225#comment-38953</guid>
		<description>[...] Daniel and I got together to sync up about Mobile 2 last week. Despite the very different tone of our follow up posts we actually agree with the take away from the conference (see Daniel&#8217;s post and my post). We both think it was a great mobile industry conference, there was litterally a flood of great information for people working in mobile and the people who were there had some great conversations and made some great connections. Where we think we didn&#8217;t do as well as we could have was in the driving toward the &#8220;2.0&#8243; version of mobile. See Daniel&#8217;s What is &#8220;Mobile 2.0&#8243; post for some of the principles and practices I was looking to discuss more at the event. We want to try to keep the conversation going online and see if we can refine and define a bit more, and perhaps carry the movement forward through future events. The What is &#8220;Mobile 2.0&#8243; post is a great starting point, here are some other fantastic posts from the event: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Daniel and I got together to sync up about Mobile 2 last week. Despite the very different tone of our follow up posts we actually agree with the take away from the conference (see Daniel&#8217;s post and my post). We both think it was a great mobile industry conference, there was litterally a flood of great information for people working in mobile and the people who were there had some great conversations and made some great connections. Where we think we didn&#8217;t do as well as we could have was in the driving toward the &#8220;2.0&#8243; version of mobile. See Daniel&#8217;s What is &#8220;Mobile 2.0&#8243; post for some of the principles and practices I was looking to discuss more at the event. We want to try to keep the conversation going online and see if we can refine and define a bit more, and perhaps carry the movement forward through future events. The What is &#8220;Mobile 2.0&#8243; post is a great starting point, here are some other fantastic posts from the event: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajit Jaokar</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/11/07/mobile-20-didnt-quite-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-38514</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajit Jaokar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=225#comment-38514</guid>
		<description>Paddy&#039;s Verry long review is now posted at OpenGardens blog http://opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2006/11/mobile20_great.html Hope you like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paddy&#8217;s Verry long review is now posted at OpenGardens blog <a href="http://opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2006/11/mobile20_great.html" rel="nofollow">http://opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2006/11/mobile20_great.html</a> Hope you like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy Byers</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/11/07/mobile-20-didnt-quite-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-38404</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy Byers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=225#comment-38404</guid>
		<description>Mike, I&#039;ve written my own review of the event which will go up on the blog shortly. I just wanted to make one comment about the format: Osney Media organise a number of conferences here in the UK and they have session presentations (kept very short), followed by a 20 minute session in which each table of (typically 10) delegates discuss the issues, and then table their conclusions back to the entire forum via a nominated spokesperson. This way you get genuine debate among a small group but then it is shared with all. When I&#039;ve been to these events it&#039;s worked really well. Better IMO than splitting into smaller rooms with splinter groups addressing individual topics.

Paddy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, I&#8217;ve written my own review of the event which will go up on the blog shortly. I just wanted to make one comment about the format: Osney Media organise a number of conferences here in the UK and they have session presentations (kept very short), followed by a 20 minute session in which each table of (typically 10) delegates discuss the issues, and then table their conclusions back to the entire forum via a nominated spokesperson. This way you get genuine debate among a small group but then it is shared with all. When I&#8217;ve been to these events it&#8217;s worked really well. Better IMO than splitting into smaller rooms with splinter groups addressing individual topics.</p>
<p>Paddy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luca Passani</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/11/07/mobile-20-didnt-quite-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-38399</link>
		<dc:creator>Luca Passani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=225#comment-38399</guid>
		<description>I can think of another 2 or 3 names at least. Drop me an email privately or ping me on skype one of these days if you want to discuss. 

Luca</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can think of another 2 or 3 names at least. Drop me an email privately or ping me on skype one of these days if you want to discuss. </p>
<p>Luca</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miker</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/11/07/mobile-20-didnt-quite-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-38379</link>
		<dc:creator>miker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 22:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=225#comment-38379</guid>
		<description>Luca, fair enough.  Who should we get to speak next time?  I need names. I am a mobile developer, and we had people building applications speaking. Who is it that you have in mind besides yourself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luca, fair enough.  Who should we get to speak next time?  I need names. I am a mobile developer, and we had people building applications speaking. Who is it that you have in mind besides yourself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

