<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile Web 2.0 Book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/10/11/mobile-web-20-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/10/11/mobile-web-20-book/</link>
	<description>Ripping mobility from the clutches of telecom</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rowehl: This is Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mobile, Web 2.0, Hype, Reality, and Openness</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/10/11/mobile-web-20-book/#comment-35902</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rowehl: This is Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mobile, Web 2.0, Hype, Reality, and Openness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=215#comment-35902</guid>
		<description>[...] So if Mobile 2.0 isn&#8217;t about the technology what is it about? One of the primary aspect is the user generated content angle I mentioned when I posted about the Mobile Web 2.0 book. But even that term is started to get thrown around like magic pixie dust. Allowing users to make your content for you doesn&#8217;t cut it. This is about users communicating and interacting in meaningful and comfortable manner, which you as a service provider support in such a way that it both maximizes the experience the user has while generating something that you can reuse. That&#8217;s sustainable, and very very hard to do correctly. Slam together some basic XHTML pages for users to fill in their interests, allow them to put up a picture, claim to be a mobile social networking site, and then spend all the time you should be using to evolve your product shouting from the rooftops how you&#8217;re a mobile 2.0 company cause you have user generated content? No, that doesn&#8217;t qualify. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So if Mobile 2.0 isn&#8217;t about the technology what is it about? One of the primary aspect is the user generated content angle I mentioned when I posted about the Mobile Web 2.0 book. But even that term is started to get thrown around like magic pixie dust. Allowing users to make your content for you doesn&#8217;t cut it. This is about users communicating and interacting in meaningful and comfortable manner, which you as a service provider support in such a way that it both maximizes the experience the user has while generating something that you can reuse. That&#8217;s sustainable, and very very hard to do correctly. Slam together some basic XHTML pages for users to fill in their interests, allow them to put up a picture, claim to be a mobile social networking site, and then spend all the time you should be using to evolve your product shouting from the rooftops how you&#8217;re a mobile 2.0 company cause you have user generated content? No, that doesn&#8217;t qualify. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
