<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet Still More Mobile Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/02/01/yet-still-more-mobile-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/02/01/yet-still-more-mobile-advertising/</link>
	<description>Ripping mobility from the clutches of telecom</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MobileW - &#187; Interesting Discussion on Mobile Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/2006/02/01/yet-still-more-mobile-advertising/#comment-64999</link>
		<dc:creator>MobileW - &#187; Interesting Discussion on Mobile Advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 04:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismobility.com/blog/?p=102#comment-64999</guid>
		<description>[...] First of all, I completely agree with Omar and Mike Rowell (thisismobility.com) that if we are talking about mobile advertisement at all - then the unobtrusive text-based ads are the way to go. That way they are doing the minimum damage to the user experience. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First of all, I completely agree with Omar and Mike Rowell (thisismobility.com) that if we are talking about mobile advertisement at all - then the unobtrusive text-based ads are the way to go. That way they are doing the minimum damage to the user experience. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
